Clinical Background
Pancreatic cancer, a common cancer in the U.S., has historically been associated with a poor outcome.
Epidemiology
- Incidence - 9-10 cases per 100,000
- Age - peak incidence 60-70 years
- Sex - M:F, 1:1.3
- Ethnicity - 30-40% higher rate in African-Americans
Risk Factors
- Low socioeconomic status
- Male gender
- Tobacco abuse
- Presence of chronic disease states
- Chronic pancreatitis
- Diabetes mellitus
- Prior cholecystectomy
- Occupational exposures
- DDT, benzidine, dry cleaning agents, polychlorinated biphenyls
- Genetics
- Increased risk if family history of pancreatic cancer
- Familial syndromes - BRCA 1 and 2 mutations, familial multiple mole melanoma syndrome, Peutz Jeghers syndrome, hereditary nonpolyposis, colorectal cancer, ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis syndrome, VHL, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, familial pancreatic cancer
Pathophysiology
- Tumor is usually ductal adenocarcinoma
- Also have mucinous cystadenocarcinomic variants
- Rare neuroendocrine tumors also affect the pancreas
- 70-80% of tumors are located in head of the pancreas
Clinical Presentation
- No specific early warning symptoms
- Usually abdominal pain and weight loss
- Obstructive jaundice if tumor is at the head of the pancreas
- Late features - ascites, abdominal mass
See Also
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
- Indications for testing
- Patient presents with jaundice and pancreatic mass
- Monitoring for tumor recurrence after surgery
- Laboratory testing
- CA 19-9 serum antigen testing - sensitivity depends on stage of cancer (70-90% sensitivity and 90% specificity)
- May be elevated in benign obstructive jaundice, chronic pancreatitis
- Should be used in conjunction with imaging studies to diagnose pancreatic cancer
- Limited use as early screening
- Serial monitoring recommended to assess follow up after potentially curative surgery or response to palliative chemotherapy
- Other potential markers include MUC-1 antigen (CA15-3 antigen) and CEACAM1 (Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1) - neither has been sufficiently validated
- Cystic lesions - fluid concentrations of amylase, CEA antigen, and CA 19-9
- Amylase <250 U/mL, CEA >800 ng/mL, CA 19-9 >37 U/mL highly suggestive of diagnosis
- Histology
- Biopsy of tumor with histologic evaluation
- FNA may result in intraperitoneal seeding
- Imaging Studies
- Transabdominal ultrasound/CT/MRI
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to outline extent of ductal involvement
Tests generally appear in the order most useful for common clinical situations
| Test name: Cancer Antigen-GI (CA 19-9)
|
| ARUP #: 0080461 |
| Methodology: Electrochemiluminescent Immunoassay
|
| Use: Diagnose and monitor pancreatic cancer |
| Limitations: Cannot be interpreted as absolute evidence of the presence or absence of malignant disease. Results obtained with different methods cannot be used interchangeably |
| Test name: Amylase, Body Fluid
|
| ARUP #: 0020506 |
| Methodology: Enzymatic
|
| Use: Assist with evaluating pancreatic cysts as benign or malignant |
| Test name: Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Fluid
|
| ARUP #: 0020742 |
| Methodology: Electrochemiluminescent Immunoassay
|
| Use: Assist with evaluating pancreatic cysts as benign or malignant |
| Test name: Immunohistochemistry Stain Offering
|
| ARUP #: arup005 |
| Methodology: Immunohistochemistry
|
| Use: For fixed tissue samples, consultative services as well as immunohistochemical staining for CAM5.2 (LMW), PGP9.5, synaptophysin, EMA, p21 and p27 are available |
Additional Tests Available
| Test name: Cancer Antigen-GI (CA 19-9), Body Fluid
|
| ARUP #: 0020746 |
| Methodology: Electrochemiluminescent Immunoassay
|
| Comments: |
References
Cited References
2006 Tumor Markers Section 3I: Tumor Markers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines And Recommendations For Use Of Tumor Markers In The Clinic. Draft Guidelines - Second Posting. (Accessed 3 Jan 2008)
Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, Somerfield MR, Hayes DF, Bast RC Jr. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol.
2006;
24(
33):
5313-5327.
General References
Canto MI. Strategies for screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in high-risk patients. Semin Oncol.
2007;
34(
4):
295-302.
Chari ST. Detecting early pancreatic cancer: problems and prospects. Semin Oncol.
2007;
34(
4):
284-294.
Ferrone CR, Brennan MF, Gonen M, Coit DG, Fong Y, Chung S, Tang L, Klimstra D, Allen PJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the actual 5-year survivors. J Gastrointest Surg.
2008;
12(
4):
701-706.
Francis IR. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cancer Imaging.
2007;
7 Spec No A:
S160-S165.
Ghaneh P, Costello E, Neoptolemos JP. Biology and management of pancreatic cancer. Gut.
2007;
56(
8):
1134-1152.
Goggins M. Identifying molecular markers for the early detection of pancreatic neoplasia. Semin Oncol.
2007;
34(
4):
303-310.
Goonetilleke KS, Siriwardena AK. Systematic review of carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) as a biochemical marker in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol.
2007;
33(
3):
266-270.
Grote T, Logsdon CD. Progress on molecular markers of pancreatic cancer. Curr Opin Gastroenterol.
2007;
23(
5):
508-514.
Hart AR, Kennedy H, Harvey I. Pancreatic cancer: a review of the evidence on causation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2008;
6(
3):
275-282.
Khalid A, Brugge W. ACG practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol.
2007;
102(
10):
2339-2349.
Maitra A, Hruban RH. Pancreatic cancer. Annu Rev Pathol.
2008;
3:
157-188.
Pappas S, Federle MP, Lokshin AE, Zeh HJ III. Early detection and staging of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Clin North Am.
2007;
36(
2):
413-29, x.
Russo S, Butler J, Ove R, Blackstock AW. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a review. Semin Oncol.
2007;
34(
4):
327-334.
Tempero M, Arnoletti JP, Ben-Josef E, Bhargava P, Casper ES, Kim P, Malafa MP, Nakakura EK, Shibata S, Talamonti M, Wang H, Willett C. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw.
2007;
5(
10):
998-1033.
van der Waaij LA, van Dullemen HM, Porte RJ. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62(
3):
383-389.
References from the ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology Research®
La'ulu SL, Roberts WL. Performance characteristics of five automated CA 19-9 assays. Am J Clin Pathol.
2007;
127(
3):
436-440.
Willmore-Payne C, Volmar KE, Huening MA, Holden JA, Layfield LJ. Molecular diagnostic testing as an adjunct to morphologic evaluation of pancreatic ductal system brushings: potential augmentation for diagnostic sensitivity. Diagn Cytopathol.
2007;
35(
4):
218-224.
Medical Reviewers
Roberts, William L. , M.D., Ph.D. Medical Director, Automated Core Laboratory at ARUP Laboratories; Professor, Pathology, University of Utah
Comprehensive Review: September 2008
Last Update: September 2008