Colorectal cancer is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S.
Epidemiology
- Incidence - 34/100,000, according to U.S. SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) database
- Age - usually greater than or equal to 50 years
- Sex - males > females
Risk Factors
- Diet high in animal fats (Western diet)
- Patients with metabolic syndrome
- Hereditary syndromes (autosomal dominant transmission)
- Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
- Rare condition where patients present with 100s to 1000s of adenomatous polyps
- Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) (Lynch syndrome)
- Extra colorectal cancers also occur, especially endometrial cancer
- Hamartomatous polyps
- Peutz Jeghers syndrome
- Juvenile polyposis
- Cowden syndrome
- Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
- Other
- Ureterosigmoidostomy - can develop more than 15 years post procedure
Pathophysiology
- Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps; although a subset may develop from hyperplastic polyps, especially large, right-sided ones
- Villous adenomas become malignant three times more frequently than tubular adenomas
- Adenocarcinoma is the usual cell type - only considered malignant if it penetrates into the submucosa
- Other tumors are uncommon
- Lymphomas, endocrine and mesenchymal tumors
Clinical Presentation
- Symptoms vary with tumor location - most are located in sigmoid colon and rectum
- Cecal and ascending colon - tumors may be very large without obstructing
- Anemia is a common presenting symptom
- Descending and transverse colon - tumors tend to obstruct and cause annular lesions (apple core or napkin ring) with abdominal pain and bloating
- Rectosigmoid - hematochezia, tenesmus and narrowing of stool caliber
- Cecal and ascending colon - tumors may be very large without obstructing
Prevention
- Aspirin and other NSAIDs
- Suppress cell proliferation by inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis
- Effects increase with duration of use
- Diets rich in fruit and vegetables
- Reduce risk
- Do not reduce incidence of subsequent adenomas in a patient with prior adenoma removal
- Estrogens
- May decrease insulin-like growth factor 1 or bile acid synthesis
Diagnosis
- Laboratory testing
- Histology
- Genetic changes in tumors
- Mostly used for the evaluation of HNPCC (Lynch syndrome)
- Microsatellite instability (MSI) can occur both with HNPCC and in sporadic colorectal cancer
- BRAF and MLH1 methylation
- BRAF gene encodes a serine-threonine kinase and plays a role in the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway
- Commonly seen in sporadic unstable colorectal cancer; has not been reported in Lynch-associated cancers
- Its presence strongly supports sporadic colon cancer
- Similarly, MLH1 methylation is commonly seen in sporadic microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer and has only rarely been reported in Lynch-associated cancers
- Genetic changes in tumors
- Germline testing for inherited colorectal cancer syndromes of affected individuals and family members
- Histology
- Imaging studies
- Colonoscopy
- Barium study
Disease Monitoring
- Carcinoembryonic antigen
- Elevated titer preoperatively predicts tumor recurrence
- Pre-operative and post-operative monitoring for changes in concentration
- Circulating tumor cell count - in metastatic tumors, monitor disease progression and response to therapy
- Others
- CA 19-9 is not recommended
- p53 - not enough data to recommend its use
Disease Screening
- Rationale - since tumor progression is sequential in polyps, locating tumors earlier will allow more cures
- Early colonoscopy for family history of hereditary cancers
- Hemoccult for stool blood
- 50% of documented colon cancers have a negative fecal occult blood test (FOBT)
- If patient is at risk, consider sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy even in the presence of a negative fecal occult blood test
- Positive FOBT mandates further testing
- 50% of documented colon cancers have a negative fecal occult blood test (FOBT)
- Colonoscopy - current recommendation
- Every 10 years beginning after age 50
| Tests |
| Test name: HNPCC/Lynch Syndrome, Microsatellite Instability by PCR |
| ARUP #: 0051740 |
| Methodology: Polymerase Chain Reaction/Fragment Analysis |
| Use: Determine whether tumor is microsatellite stable or unstable for Lynch/HNPCC workup |
| Test name: Occult Blood, Fecal |
| ARUP #: 0020374 |
| Methodology: Colorimetry |
| Use:
Annual screening test in patients over 50 years of age
|
| Limitations: Immunochemical assays provide better sensitivity and specificity than guaiac-based tests For at-risk patients with negative results, sigmoidoscopy is recommended |
| Test name: Microsatellite Instability/HNPCC by Immunohistochemical Stain |
| ARUP #: 0049302 |
| Methodology: Immunohistochemistry |
| Use: Surrogate test for microsatellite instability and may help guide subsequent mutation analysis |
| Test name: HNPCC/Lynch Syndrome, Family Specific Mutation |
| ARUP #: 0051648 |
| Methodology: Polymerase Chain Reaction/Sequencing or Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification |
| Use: Evaluate family members for a known family mutation in a mismatch repair gene |
| Test name: HNPCC/Lynch Syndrome (PMS2) Sequencing and Deletion/Duplication |
| ARUP #: 0051737 |
| Methodology: Polymerase Chain Reaction/Sequencing/Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification |
| Use: Detect mutations in PMS2 gene |
| Test name: MLH1 Full Gene Analysis |
| ARUP #: 0051650 |
| Methodology: Polymerase Chain Reaction/Sequencing/Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification |
| Use: Detect mutations and large deletions in MLH1 gene |
| Test name: MSH2 Full Gene Analysis |
| ARUP #: 0051654 |
| Methodology: Polymerase Chain Reaction/Sequencing/Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification |
| Use: Detect mutations and large deletions in MSH2 gene |
| Test name: MSH6 Full Gene Analysis |
| ARUP #: 0051656 |
| Methodology: Polymerase Chain Reaction/Sequencing/Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification |
| Use: Detect mutations and large deletions in MSH6 gene |
| Test name: BRAF V600E Mutation with Reflex to MLH1 Promoter Methylation, Paraffin |
| ARUP #: 0051750 |
| Methodology: Polymerase Chain Reaction/Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Analysis |
| Use: Detect the presence of the V600E mutation in colorectal cancers Determine whether further workup for HNPCC is necessary If no BRAF mutation is detected, MLH1 promoter methylation is evaluated. This can also help determine whether further workup for HNPCC is indicated |
| Limitations: Mutations other than BRAF V600E will not be detected The presence of less than 10 to 20% of a mutant allele may not be detected |
| Test name: Carcinoembryonic Antigen |
| ARUP #: 0080080 |
| Methodology: Eletrochemiluminescent Immunoassay |
| Use:
Monitor tumor recurrence
|
| Limitations: Not sensitive or specific enough for screening in the general population |
| Follow-up: |
| Test name: Circulating Tumor Cell Count (Cell Search) |
| ARUP #: 0093399 |
| Methodology: Immunomagnetic separation/Immunofluorescence staining/Computer assisted analysis |
| Use: For use in metastatic tumors Use in conjunction with clinical data and imaging Monitor disease progression Monitor response to therapy when comparing baseline values to serially monitor response and assess prognosis Prognostic marker that provides information about progression free survival and overall survival |
| Test name: Immunohistochemistry Stain Offering |
| ARUP #: arup005 |
| Methodology: Immunohistochemistry |
| Use: For fixed tissue samples, consultative services as well as immunohistochemical staining for CEA, CK20, Muc-1, Muc-2 Glycoprotein, p16, p21, p27, p53, microsatellite instability/HNPCC, and EGFR pharmDX™ are available |
| Test name: Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Fluid |
| ARUP #: 0020742 |
| Methodology: Electrochemiluminescent Immunoassay |
| Comments: The CEA assay value, regardless of level, should not be interpreted as evidence for the presence or absence of malignant disease and is not recommended for use as a screening procedure to detect the presence of cancer in the general population |
| Test name: Occult Blood, Fecal (1-3 determinations) |
| ARUP #: 0020588 |
| Methodology: Colorimetry |
| Comments: |
Guidelines
General References
References from the ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology Research®
Comprehensive Review: March 2008
Last Update: September 2008

















